Gunung Padang in Indonesia sparks debate as Archaeologists question whether it’s Man-made or naturally formed.

A recent study claiming that a ‘pyramid‘ discovered at Gunung Padang in Indonesia dates back 25,000 years and exhibits hidden chambers has sparked controversy among archaeologists. While the initial research suggested that this ancient structure was a man-made pyramid, dissenting voices in the archaeological community argue otherwise.

The study conducted at Gunung Padang reported evidence of human activity dating back thousands of years, with construction stages reaching the Palaeolithic era. The authors concluded that the site is not a natural hill but a pyramid-like construction.

However, critics have countered this claim, asserting that the ‘pyramid’ may not have been built by humans at all. Archaeologists argue that there is insufficient evidence to support the assertion that the structure was deliberately constructed. In the absence of typical signs of human activity, such as charcoal or bone fragments, some suggest that the formation is more likely to be a result of natural processes.

Flint Dibble, an archaeologist at Cardiff University, expressed skepticism, stating that unless extraordinary evidence emerges, the structure likely formed naturally. He emphasized the importance of examining the layers of soil for indicators of human involvement.

Lutfi Yondri, an archaeologist at BRIN in Bandung, Indonesia, presented findings indicating human habitation in the area between 12,000 and 6,000 years ago. However, there is no evidence to suggest that these ancient inhabitants possessed the masonry capabilities required for constructing a ‘pyramid.’

As debates continue, the mystery surrounding Gunung Padang’s origin deepens, leaving researchers and enthusiasts eager for further exploration and conclusive evidence.